A) They may be part of a brochure.
B) They may not arise from a salesperson's oral promise.
C) A sample may provide an express warranty.
D) They may be part of a written sales or lease contract.
E) A model may provide an express warranty.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Implied warranty of merchantability
B) Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
C) Implied warranty of trade usage
D) Express warranty of integrity
E) Implied warranty of quality
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Consensual promises
B) Contractual promises
C) Warranties
D) Affirmances
E) Engagements
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A seller must provide an express, full warranty.
B) A seller must provide an implied, full warranty.
C) A seller must provide at least an express, limited warranty.
D) A seller must provide at least an implied, limited warranty.
E) The act does not require that the seller provide any warranties.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Warranties are not recognized in Hong Kong.
B) Time of payment and delivery are considered warranties.
C) Time of payment is considered a warranty, but delivery is not considered a warranty.
D) Delivery is considered a warranty, but time of payment is not considered a warranty.
E) Conditions are considered the same as warranties.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It operates as a waiver of warranty rights under the contract.
B) There is no effect so long as the plaintiff can establish that he or she was not aware of the statute of limitations.
C) It operates as a waiver of warranty rights only if the defendant can establish that the plaintiff had actual knowledge of the statute of limitations.
D) It results in the plaintiff only having the right to sue for injunctive relief, not damages.
E) It results in the plaintiff only having the right to sue for damages, not injunctive relief.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Both parties must be merchants and a sale, not a lease, must be involved.
B) Both parties must be merchants, and either a sale or lease must be involved.
C) The seller must be a merchant and a sale, not a lease, must be involved.
D) The seller must be a merchant, and either a sale or lease must be involved.
E) The seller must be a merchant, goods valued at over $500 must be involved, and either a sale or lease must be involved.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) That when a party "assigns" a contract to another party, the assignor is impliedly providing a warranty of merchantability.
B) That when a party "assigns" a contract to another party, the assignor is impliedly guaranteeing a warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
C) That when a party "assigns" a contract to another party, the assignor is impliedly guaranteeing that the rights being assigned are valid.
D) That when a party "assigns" a contract to another party, the assignor is expressly guaranteeing a warranty of merchantability for fitness.
E) That when a party "assigns" a contract to another party, the person being assigned contractual rights expressly agrees to provide consideration.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Samantha made an express warranty by not speaking up regarding the blender's power.
B) Samantha made an express warranty by not speaking up regarding the blender's power only if Rebecca can prove that Samantha knew it was not a high-power blender.
C) Samantha made an express warranty by not speaking up regarding the blender's power only if Rebecca can prove that Samantha knew she wanted to make smoothies.
D) Samantha made an express warranty by not speaking up regarding the blender's power only if Samantha can prove that she, Samantha, was unaware that the blender was not a high-power blender.
E) Samantha did not make an express warranty.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No, because there was no writing guaranteeing the warranty signed by the salesperson.
B) No, because Sally was only engaged in puffing.
C) No, because only the manager can make such a warranty.
D) Yes, but only because Sally verbally made certain promises.
E) Yes, because there was a reasonable expectation of how the vehicle would perform.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) There is no implied warranty of merchantability because of a lack of evidence that Samantha made any express statements regarding the blender.
B) There is no implied warranty of merchantability because a consumer appliance was involved.
C) There is no implied warranty of merchantability because Samantha was not a merchant in respect to consumer appliances.
D) There was an implied warranty of merchantability because a consumer appliance was involved.
E) There was an implied warranty of merchantability because no merchant in goods of that type was involved.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Express warranty
B) Implied warranty
C) Acknowledged warranty
D) Claimed warranty
E) Consequential warranty
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A buyer may not waive warranties.
B) A buyer may waive implied warranties but not express warranties.
C) A buyer may waive express warranties but not implied warranties.
D) A buyer may waive both express warranties and implied warranties.
E) A buyer may waive express warranties and the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, but not the implied warranty of merchantability.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the implied warranty of title did not extend to subsequent purchasers.
B) That the implied warranty of title did extend to subsequent purchasers.
C) That the implied warranty of title extended only to subsequent purchasers who purchased within 12 months.
D) That the implied warranty of title extended only to subsequent purchasers who purchased within 4 years.
E) That the implied warranty of title extended only to the first three subsequent purchasers, but no further.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court found that the puppy was not a good covered under the UCC, and the plaintiff was denied recovery.
B) The court refused any recovery to the plaintiff on the basis that the seller was not considered a merchant under the UCC and that no implied warranties were made.
C) The buyer in essence had no remedy because the court ruled that the plaintiff's only remedy, which the plaintiff was unwilling to do, was return of the puppy for a refund.
D) The court allowed the buyer to recover the contract price only, not veterinarian bills.
E) The court awarded the plaintiff the veterinary bills finding that the UCC applied and that the seller breached the warranty of merchantability.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 65
Related Exams