Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Negotiable instruments payable to whoever is bearing them are known as ______ instruments.


A) Demand
B) Order
C) Transactional
D) Bearer
E) Payor

F) C) and D)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Set forth the two exceptions to the time-certain requirement for negotiability discussed in the text.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

First, an instrument that permits accele...

View Answer

Which of the following is true regarding the relationship between negotiability and an unconditional promise or order to pay?


A) There is no such requirement in order to find negotiability.
B) A promise or order to pay must be specific and not be implied in order for negotiability to be found.
C) Simply acknowledging a debt satisfies the negotiability requirement of an unconditional promise to pay.
D) A common IOU is sufficient to satisfy the negotiability requirement of an unconditional promise to pay.
E) An offer of unconditional partial payment satisfies requirements of negotiability.

F) A) and E)
G) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A ______ is a specific draft, drawn by the owner of a checking account, ordering the bank to pay the payee from that drawer's account.


A) Promissory contract
B) Certificates of deposit
C) Note
D) Check
E) Time instrument

F) C) and D)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In order to satisfy the requirement of negotiability that payment be at a time certain or on demand, acceleration of payment is not allowable.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A currency or cash substitution is a relatively new development in the law arising in the 20th century.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following was the result in Samuel James Thompson v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co., the case in the text in which the parties disagreed as to whether an instrument referenced as a certificate of deposit was actually negotiable?


A) The court ruled that the instrument was negotiable.
B) The court ruled that the instrument was not negotiable because it clearly stated that it was non-transferable.
C) The court ruled that the instrument was not negotiable because it lacked the signatures of both parties.
D) The court ruled that the instrument was not negotiable because it lacked the signature of a bank representative.
E) The court ruled that the instrument was not negotiable because it contained a condition precedent and was not an unconditional order to pay.

F) None of the above
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An automated signature satisfies the UCC requirement that the signature of the creator appear in order for an instrument to be negotiable.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What is the difference between a demand instrument and a time instrument?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

With a demand instrument, the ...

View Answer

Which of the following was the result in State v. Warner, the case in the text involving whether an electronic transfer qualified as a "draft" or "other written statement" for purposes of establishing a violation of state law?


A) That an electronic transfer qualified as a draft or other written statement for purposes of establishing a violation of the state law at issue.
B) That an electronic transfer did not qualify as a draft or other written statement for purposes of establishing a violation of the state law at issue.
C) That an electronic transfer qualified as a draft or other written statement for purposes of establishing a violation of the state law at issue only if it could be established that a bank official described the transaction as a "draft."
D) That an electronic transfer qualified as a draft or other written statement for purposes of establishing a violation of the state law at issue only if it could be established that a bank official described the transaction as a "negotiable."
E) That the issue of whether the instrument was a draft or other written statement was irrelevant because the state law at issue was unconstitutional.

F) A) and E)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The ancient ____, or law of merchants, of ______ recognized that agreements could be paid for with documents that promised payment and that these documents themselves could then be circulated as a substitute for money.


A) Lex mercatoria; England
B) Lax trade; England
C) Lex merchantia; France
D) Lax merchant; Italy
E) Lexi merchant; France

F) C) and D)
G) D) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Set forth the seven requirements for an instrument to be negotiable.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The seven requirements for an instrument...

View Answer

Which of the following is true regarding negotiation of an instrument?


A) Negotiation of both an order instrument and bearer instrument is by delivery alone.
B) Negotiation of both an order instrument and bearer instrument require endorsement plus delivery.
C) Negotiation of an order instrument is by endorsement plus delivery, while negotiation of a bearer instrument is by delivery alone.
D) Negotiation of a bearer instrument is by endorsement plus delivery, while negotiation of an order instrument is by delivery alone.
E) Negotiation of both an order instrument and a bearer instrument requires both delivery and an additional three days to allow for bank clearance.

F) None of the above
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is a written document containing the signature of the creator that makes an unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain in money at either a time certain or on demand?


A) A negated instrument
B) A promised instrument
C) A negotiable instrument
D) A promissory agreement
E) A negotiable agreement

F) All of the above
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A negotiable instrument must be a conditional order to pay.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Documents used as payments to facilitate commercial transactions were labeled as ______ under article 3 of the UCC.


A) Commerce paper
B) Commercial paper
C) Commerce notes
D) Negotiable instruments
E) Payment notes

F) A) and B)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

"Yard Mowing." Paula agreed to mow John's yard once a week for $50 per week throughout the summer. Paula, however, was having trouble getting her money from John. On one occasion, he in handwriting gave her in IOU saying "I, John Jones, owe Paula Smith $50." A couple of weeks later, John did not have the money to pay Paula what he owed her, and he handwrote the following on a piece of paper and gave it to her: "I, John Jones, promise to pay Paula Smith or to bearer, the sum of $100 on Monday, July 22, 2013." Paula quit mowing John's yard; and, disgusted with John, Paula assigned both documents to Vince. When Vince presented the documents to John, John refused to pay on the basis that after inspecting the yard, he decided that Paula was doing a poor job. Vince told him the documents constituted negotiable instruments, but John pointed out that he had not signed the documents with his signature at the end. -What is the effect of the instruments being written by hand?


A) Handwriting does not prevent the instruments from being considered negotiable only because neither Paula nor John would be considered merchants in the transactions at issue.
B) Handwriting does not prevent the instruments from being considered negotiable only because John would not be considered a merchant in the transaction at issue, and Paula's status as a merchant is irrelevant.
C) Handwriting does not prevent the instrument from being considered negotiable only because Paula would not be considered a merchant in the transaction at issue, and John's status as a merchant is irrelevant.
D) Handwriting does not prevent the IOU instrument from being negotiable, but it does prevent the other instrument from being negotiable.
E) The issue of the instruments being handwritten does not prevent either from being considered negotiable.

F) A) and D)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true regarding an IOU instrument containing the language "payable on demand"?


A) The instrument is not negotiable because it does not contain an unconditional promise or order to pay, but it may be an enforceable contract.
B) The instrument contains an unconditional promise to pay; and, therefore, the fact that it is an IOU instrument does not affect negotiability.
C) The instrument contains an unconditional promise to pay but nevertheless is not negotiable because it is an IOU instrument.
D) The instrument is not negotiable because the words "payable on demand" are included; otherwise, the IOU instrument would contain an unconditional promise to pay.
E) The instrument is not negotiable, nor could it be an enforceable contract, because it does not contain an unconditional promise to pay.

F) A) and E)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

"Yard Mowing." Paula agreed to mow John's yard once a week for $50 per week throughout the summer. Paula, however, was having trouble getting her money from John. On one occasion, he in handwriting gave her in IOU saying "I, John Jones, owe Paula Smith $50." A couple of weeks later, John did not have the money to pay Paula what he owed her, and he handwrote the following on a piece of paper and gave it to her: "I, John Jones, promise to pay Paula Smith or to bearer, the sum of $100 on Monday, July 22, 2013." Paula quit mowing John's yard; and, disgusted with John, Paula assigned both documents to Vince. When Vince presented the documents to John, John refused to pay on the basis that after inspecting the yard, he decided that Paula was doing a poor job. Vince told him the documents constituted negotiable instruments, but John pointed out that he had not signed the documents with his signature at the end. -Which of the following is true regarding the effect on negotiability of John's determination that Paula did a poor job mowing the yard?


A) Paula's performance prevents the instruments from being negotiable only if John meets the burden of proof of establishing to the judge by a preponderance of the evidence that Paula did a poor job mowing the yard.
B) Paula's performance prevents the instruments from being negotiable only if Paula meets the burden of proof of establishing to the judge by a preponderance of the evidence that she did an acceptable job mowing the yard.
C) Paula's performance prevents the instruments from being negotiable only if John meets the burden of proof of establishing to the judge by a preponderance of the evidence that Paula did a poor job mowing the yard, and if Paula signed and provided to John a document agreeing that the instrument would lack negotiability unless she properly performed.
D) Paula's performance prevents the instruments from being negotiable only if Paula meets the burden of proof of establishing to the judge by a preponderance of the evidence that she did an acceptable job mowing the yard and that she did not sign any document agreeing that the instrument would lack negotiability upon John's objection.
E) Manner of performance is not one of the listed elements for a finding of negotiability.

F) A) and E)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

"Book Payment." Molly and Pat signed a contract providing that "Pat will furnish the correct used business law book for use in Molly's business law class; and on August 15, 2013, Molly promises to pay Pat $50 for the book." Molly took the book and planned to pay Pat. Meanwhile, Pat properly assigned the contract Molly had signed to Jack. When Molly went to class, however, she discovered that the book was the incorrect book. When Jack asked Molly for payment, Molly refused. Molly told Jack that the book was useless to her and that she was not paying either him or Pat anything for it. Jack told Molly that he had an enforceable assignment in the form of a negotiable instrument and that he could collect regardless of whether the book was useless. Molly did not believe him. Since she was trying to save money on books, she also agreed to buy Tim's U.S. history book for $40. She had an oral agreement with Tim that he would give her the book and that she would pay him in three days. This time Molly got the right book. Tim, in writing, properly assigned the right to the $40 payment to Richard. Richard asked Molly for the money. Molly admitted her agreement with Tim but told Richard that she was not going to pay him because he did not have a negotiable instrument. Molly also purchased a communications book from Sam promising in writing to give him, to his order, a DVD she had in return the next day. -What is the effect of Molly agreeing to give Sam a DVD in return for the book?


A) Molly and Sam have an enforceable contract, and Molly has also satisfied the negotiability condition regarding the form of payment.
B) Molly and Sam have an enforceable contract, but the agreement fails to satisfy the negotiability requirement that payment be in a sum certain in money.
C) Because payment is not in a sum certain for money, Molly and Sam do not have an enforceable contract nor does the agreement satisfy the negotiability requirement that payment be in a sum certain in money.
D) Because payment is not in a sum certain for money, Molly and Sam do not have an enforceable contract, but the requirement of negotiability regarding the form of payment has been satisfied.
E) Unless Sam acknowledges in writing that the fair market value of the DVD is equivalent to the value of the book he provided to Molly, there is no enforceable contract nor is the agreement negotiable.

F) None of the above
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 41 - 60 of 66

Related Exams

Show Answer