A) Demand
B) Order
C) Transactional
D) Bearer
E) Payor
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) There is no such requirement in order to find negotiability.
B) A promise or order to pay must be specific and not be implied in order for negotiability to be found.
C) Simply acknowledging a debt satisfies the negotiability requirement of an unconditional promise to pay.
D) A common IOU is sufficient to satisfy the negotiability requirement of an unconditional promise to pay.
E) An offer of unconditional partial payment satisfies requirements of negotiability.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Promissory contract
B) Certificates of deposit
C) Note
D) Check
E) Time instrument
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that the instrument was negotiable.
B) The court ruled that the instrument was not negotiable because it clearly stated that it was non-transferable.
C) The court ruled that the instrument was not negotiable because it lacked the signatures of both parties.
D) The court ruled that the instrument was not negotiable because it lacked the signature of a bank representative.
E) The court ruled that the instrument was not negotiable because it contained a condition precedent and was not an unconditional order to pay.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) That an electronic transfer qualified as a draft or other written statement for purposes of establishing a violation of the state law at issue.
B) That an electronic transfer did not qualify as a draft or other written statement for purposes of establishing a violation of the state law at issue.
C) That an electronic transfer qualified as a draft or other written statement for purposes of establishing a violation of the state law at issue only if it could be established that a bank official described the transaction as a "draft."
D) That an electronic transfer qualified as a draft or other written statement for purposes of establishing a violation of the state law at issue only if it could be established that a bank official described the transaction as a "negotiable."
E) That the issue of whether the instrument was a draft or other written statement was irrelevant because the state law at issue was unconstitutional.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Lex mercatoria; England
B) Lax trade; England
C) Lex merchantia; France
D) Lax merchant; Italy
E) Lexi merchant; France
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Negotiation of both an order instrument and bearer instrument is by delivery alone.
B) Negotiation of both an order instrument and bearer instrument require endorsement plus delivery.
C) Negotiation of an order instrument is by endorsement plus delivery, while negotiation of a bearer instrument is by delivery alone.
D) Negotiation of a bearer instrument is by endorsement plus delivery, while negotiation of an order instrument is by delivery alone.
E) Negotiation of both an order instrument and a bearer instrument requires both delivery and an additional three days to allow for bank clearance.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A negated instrument
B) A promised instrument
C) A negotiable instrument
D) A promissory agreement
E) A negotiable agreement
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Commerce paper
B) Commercial paper
C) Commerce notes
D) Negotiable instruments
E) Payment notes
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Handwriting does not prevent the instruments from being considered negotiable only because neither Paula nor John would be considered merchants in the transactions at issue.
B) Handwriting does not prevent the instruments from being considered negotiable only because John would not be considered a merchant in the transaction at issue, and Paula's status as a merchant is irrelevant.
C) Handwriting does not prevent the instrument from being considered negotiable only because Paula would not be considered a merchant in the transaction at issue, and John's status as a merchant is irrelevant.
D) Handwriting does not prevent the IOU instrument from being negotiable, but it does prevent the other instrument from being negotiable.
E) The issue of the instruments being handwritten does not prevent either from being considered negotiable.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The instrument is not negotiable because it does not contain an unconditional promise or order to pay, but it may be an enforceable contract.
B) The instrument contains an unconditional promise to pay; and, therefore, the fact that it is an IOU instrument does not affect negotiability.
C) The instrument contains an unconditional promise to pay but nevertheless is not negotiable because it is an IOU instrument.
D) The instrument is not negotiable because the words "payable on demand" are included; otherwise, the IOU instrument would contain an unconditional promise to pay.
E) The instrument is not negotiable, nor could it be an enforceable contract, because it does not contain an unconditional promise to pay.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Paula's performance prevents the instruments from being negotiable only if John meets the burden of proof of establishing to the judge by a preponderance of the evidence that Paula did a poor job mowing the yard.
B) Paula's performance prevents the instruments from being negotiable only if Paula meets the burden of proof of establishing to the judge by a preponderance of the evidence that she did an acceptable job mowing the yard.
C) Paula's performance prevents the instruments from being negotiable only if John meets the burden of proof of establishing to the judge by a preponderance of the evidence that Paula did a poor job mowing the yard, and if Paula signed and provided to John a document agreeing that the instrument would lack negotiability unless she properly performed.
D) Paula's performance prevents the instruments from being negotiable only if Paula meets the burden of proof of establishing to the judge by a preponderance of the evidence that she did an acceptable job mowing the yard and that she did not sign any document agreeing that the instrument would lack negotiability upon John's objection.
E) Manner of performance is not one of the listed elements for a finding of negotiability.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Molly and Sam have an enforceable contract, and Molly has also satisfied the negotiability condition regarding the form of payment.
B) Molly and Sam have an enforceable contract, but the agreement fails to satisfy the negotiability requirement that payment be in a sum certain in money.
C) Because payment is not in a sum certain for money, Molly and Sam do not have an enforceable contract nor does the agreement satisfy the negotiability requirement that payment be in a sum certain in money.
D) Because payment is not in a sum certain for money, Molly and Sam do not have an enforceable contract, but the requirement of negotiability regarding the form of payment has been satisfied.
E) Unless Sam acknowledges in writing that the fair market value of the DVD is equivalent to the value of the book he provided to Molly, there is no enforceable contract nor is the agreement negotiable.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 66
Related Exams