FiltersDone

Question type

Essay

Multiple Choice

Short Answer

True False

Matching

Exam 2: Business Ethics and Social Responsibility

Show Answer

Share

---

All types

Filters

Study FlashcardsPractice ExamLearn

Question 1

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Billy, a witness to a motor vehicle accident, is gravely ill with cancer. Pat, who was injured in the accident, would like to preserve his testimony for trial in case he dies before the trial date. What should Pat do?

A) Send interrogatories to Billy.
B) Take Billy's deposition.
C) Send a request to admit to Billy that the accident was the defendant's fault.
D) Have a conference with the judge and Billy.
E) There is nothing she can do.

F) A) and C)
G) None of the above

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 2

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Peremptory challenges in jury selection may not be racially based.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 3

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

What is a summary jury trial?

Reference - Supreme Court. Jim, who is a bit eccentric, says that he is fed up with the way a certain employer in his town treats employees and that he is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters. Jim also says that he is going to start his case at the appellate court level, skipping over all those "lesser" judges. Jim says that those justices will surely hear him out and that he will also seek a jury. Although he is not a lawyer, Jim believes that the offenses of the employer are so severe that the justices will appreciate his attempt to make things better for the employees involved. Regardless of what court is involved, can Jim act as plaintiff for the employees?

Intermediate courts of appeal exist in all states.

Which of the following is a question of fact?

The term ADR refers to the resolution of legal disputes through methods other than litigation.

Assuming there are no vacancies, how many U.S. Supreme Court justices are there?

What is a provision in a contract mandating that all disputes arising under the contract be settled by arbitration called?

Once a case is in the proper court system, venue determines which trial court in the system will hear the case.

When is an arbitrator's decision called an "award"?

Which of the following is true of the Supreme Court in Japan?

Which of the following is typically an appropriate venue in a lawsuit?

Only one party may appeal from a final judgment.

Reference - Sexual Harassment ADR. Jenny is very angry with her supervisor, Sleaze, at the Mexican fast-food restaurant at which she works which is owned by an international company located in Mexico. He has been making inappropriate sexual comments to her and other employees. Jenny decides to sue and retains a lawyer, Brice. Brice talks with the owners of the restaurant and is informed that Jenny signed an agreement to arbitrate any claims. Brice tells Jenny that it is completely up to her and that if she wishes, she can disregard the arbitration agreement and proceed to court. Jenny informed Brice about other employees who had complained about sexual harassment and entered into mediation agreements. Brice promises her that he will get copies of all documents and everything that was taken down by the court reporter at those mediations. He also tells Jenny in response to her question about the possibility of mediation in her case to forget it because mediation is pretty much the same thing as arbitration. Did Brice correctly tell Jenny that mediation is nearly the same as arbitration?

Subject-matter jurisdiction is a court's power to hear certain kinds of cases.

Reference - Sexual Harassment ADR. Jenny is very angry with her supervisor, Sleaze, at the Mexican fast-food restaurant at which she works which is owned by an international company located in Mexico. He has been making inappropriate sexual comments to her and other employees. Jenny decides to sue and retains a lawyer, Brice. Brice talks with the owners of the restaurant and is informed that Jenny signed an agreement to arbitrate any claims. Brice tells Jenny that it is completely up to her and that if she wishes, she can disregard the arbitration agreement and proceed to court. Jenny informed Brice about other employees who had complained about sexual harassment and entered into mediation agreements. Brice promises her that he will get copies of all documents and everything that was taken down by the court reporter at those mediations. He also tells Jenny in response to her question about the possibility of mediation in her case to forget it because mediation is pretty much the same thing as arbitration. Can Brice obtain information from the previous mediators regarding what occurred at the previous mediations?

Reference - Puppy Woes. Sam promised to sell Linda a Welsh Corgi puppy for $300 but backed out of the deal. Linda sued Sam in state court for breach of contract. Linda asked for a jury in her complaint. During jury selection, one juror, Ann, said that they did not think they could be fair to Linda because Linda did not appear to be a dog lover. Linda asked that Ann not hear the case, and the judge excused Ann. Linda also decided that another juror, Sandy, looked at her in a grumpy manner so she asked the judge to excuse that juror from serving. The judge did so. After the jury was chosen, Linda made a statement to the jury as did Sam. Linda then called to the witness stand a friend of hers, Brenda, who heard the discussion held between Linda and Sam regarding the purchase of the puppy. Brenda testified under questioning by Linda that she heard Linda say that she would pay $300 for the puppy and that she also heard Sam say that he would sell the dog for that amount. Unfortunately for Linda, Brenda also testified in response to questioning by Sam that Sam distinctly told Linda that he would only sell the puppy to her if Linda came with cash for the puppy within seven days. Linda did not show up with the money for ten days and Sam had already sold the dog to someone else. The judge ruled in favor of Sam. The statements made to the jury by Linda and Sam immediately after the jury was chosen were _____________.

The court may properly grant a _____________ if after reviewing the pleadings, the judge determines that the only reasonable decision is in favor of the moving party.

Assume you know that Robert has told a lie about a friend of yours, Yolanda. You tell Yolanda that she should sue for defamation, but she has no interest in that. Can you sue on behalf of Yolanda?