A) No,because it is a contract related to an interest in land and must be in writing.
B) No,because the value is over $500.
C) Yes,because it is a boundary dispute settled through the use of land.
D) The agreement involving the property under the cherry tree must be in writing because the tree is part of the land,but the property under the stepping stones need not be in writing.
E) Yes,because there was no money exchanged.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Merger
B) Complete
C) Bilateral
D) Acknowledged
E) Adhesion
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) $600
B) $1,000
C) $300
D) $200
E) $500
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The delineated rule
B) The resulting-fact rule
C) The main-purpose rule
D) The personal-obligation standard
E) The primary-purpose rule
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act reflects the decision that particular electronic transactions may constitute a "written copy" and therefore have legal significance.
B) The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act was adopted as law in only half of all states.
C) The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act adopts the requirements of the statute of frauds regarding the validity of online transactions.
D) Statutes that addressed electronic transactions have been around for years.
E) The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act was passed in 2000.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The offeree only
B) The party against whom action is sought
C) Any party to the contract
D) The offeror only
E) Only a person who has agreed to pay the debt of another
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Lani offers to buy the corner of Ry's property where Ry's horse grazes.
B) Lani offers to paint Ry's house for $1,000
C) Lani offers to buy Ry's horse for $1,000.
D) Lani offers to pay Ry's student loan if Ry defaults.
E) Lani offers to marry Ry in three years.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Reliance rule
B) Promissory reliance
C) Promissory estoppel
D) Promissory rule
E) Substantial estoppel
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that the agreement did involve an interest in land and,therefore came within the statute of frauds.
B) The court ruled that the agreement to share in the appreciation of the value of the land did not fall within the statute of frauds and that no writing was needed,but that the agreement to share the rental income did fall within the statute of frauds requiring a writing.
C) The court ruled that the land constituted an asset of the partnership,so the partnership agreement did not come within the statute of frauds.
D) The court ruled that the agreement fell within the statute of frauds but that an oral agreement was sufficient.
E) The court ruled that the agreement did not involve an interest in land but placed it within the statute of frauds in order to prevent injustice.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 81 - 90 of 90
Related Exams